[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071223.221355.40687949.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:13:55 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: dshwatrz@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6][NEIGH] Updating affected neighbours when about
MAC address change
In article <31436f4a0712230504x7b0b4f38i8f69a7a825bcc14b@...l.gmail.com> (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:04:37 +0200), "David Shwatrz" <dshwatrz@...il.com> says:
> Hello,
>
>
> >You should iterate all of ifa_list (for IPv4) / addr_list (for IPv6).
> > For IPv6, we also have anycast (maintained by ac_list) as well.
>
> I am not sure that we need to iterate all of ifa_list in IPv4.
> The reason is that we end with arp_send, and it initiates a broadcast.
> So all neighbours will receive it and update their arp tables
> accordingly.
> The dest hw in the arp_send is NULL according to this patch ; this means that
> we will assign dev->broadcast to dest_hw in apr_create().
>
> It seems to me there's no reason to send more than one broadcast.
Urgh? what is happend if you have multiple IPv4 addresses on the device?
> In IPv6, I need to check, since it is multicast.
Please read RFC2461 Section 7.2.6. In short we should send a few
unsolicited NA, but I think you can start from sending once per an
address.
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists