[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31436f4a0712230521m2a2745fcse56ba93529fd8034@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:21:04 +0200
From: "David Shwatrz" <dshwatrz@...il.com>
To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明"
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6][NEIGH] Updating affected neighbours when about MAC address change
Yoshfuji,
Thanks, you are right ! soon I will send the patches.
Thanks !
DS
On Dec 23, 2007 3:13 PM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> wrote:
> In article <31436f4a0712230504x7b0b4f38i8f69a7a825bcc14b@...l.gmail.com> (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:04:37 +0200), "David Shwatrz" <dshwatrz@...il.com> says:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > >You should iterate all of ifa_list (for IPv4) / addr_list (for IPv6).
> > > For IPv6, we also have anycast (maintained by ac_list) as well.
> >
> > I am not sure that we need to iterate all of ifa_list in IPv4.
> > The reason is that we end with arp_send, and it initiates a broadcast.
> > So all neighbours will receive it and update their arp tables
> > accordingly.
> > The dest hw in the arp_send is NULL according to this patch ; this means that
> > we will assign dev->broadcast to dest_hw in apr_create().
> >
> > It seems to me there's no reason to send more than one broadcast.
>
> Urgh? what is happend if you have multiple IPv4 addresses on the device?
>
>
> > In IPv6, I need to check, since it is multicast.
>
> Please read RFC2461 Section 7.2.6. In short we should send a few
> unsolicited NA, but I think you can start from sending once per an
> address.
>
> --yoshfuji
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists