[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1198513837.4427.8.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:30:37 -0500
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IPROUTE2] Compatibility with iptables 1.4.0
On Mon, 2007-24-12 at 18:07 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Hi, probably like this will be better?
> Previous patch was not backward compatible.
>
> Btw i checked twice, name is changed from libipt_MARK to libxt_MARK. So
> probably when you have tested this, your iproute2 was looking to old
> libipt_MARK (iptables is not deleting old libraries on make install).
>
Grr. I tested with a different iptables target and thought the rest work
in the same manner. iptables needs to be consistent.
-----
lilsol:~# export IPTABLES_LIB_DIR=/root/iptables-1.4.0/extensions/
lilsol:~# tc actions add action ipt -j TOS --set-tos
Maximize-Reliability
tablename: mangle hook: NF_IP_POST_ROUTING
target: TOS set Maximize-Reliability index 0
lilsol:~# tc actions ls action ipt
action order 0: tablename: mangle hook: NF_IP_POST_ROUTING
target TOS set Maximize-Reliability
index 2 ref 1 bind 0
// the above is what i tested
// below is what you did
lilsol:~# tc actions add action ipt -j mark --set-mark 3
/root/iptables-1.4.0/extensions/: cannot read file data: Is a directory
failed to find target mark
bad action parsing
parse_action: bad value (5:ipt)!
Illegal "action"
Command "add" is unknown, try "tc actions help".
lilsol:~#
------------
Applying your patch ....
Seems corrupt; let me fix it up, test it and resend it to Stephen.
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists