netdev - Re: Simple question about network stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:41:46 +0200
From:	"Denys Fedoryshchenko" <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru>,
	Marek Kierdelewicz <marek@...sta.pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Simple question about network stack

Probably you have enabled in kernel "Enable kernel irq balancing" or
CONFIG_IRQBALANCE

It is wrong. It has to be disabled.

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 11:52:48 +0300, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote
> Marek Kierdelewicz:
> > Hi,
> >
> >   
> >> Have 2 Ethernet adapters e1000. Have 8 CPU (4 real).
> >> Computer work as Shaper. Use only TC rules to shape and IPTABLES to
> >> drop.
> >> question:
> >> 1. I may balance load to other cpu? I understand that i can't balance
> >> polling place, but find in TC and IPTABLES hash may do different cpu?
> >>     
> >
> > You need as many nics as cpus to effectivelu use all your processing
> > power. You can pair-up nics and cpus by configuring appropriate irq
> > smp affinity. Read in [1] from line 350 on.
> >   
> Interesting. Sorry if my questions will be stupid. "smp affinity" its
> was i need, but it not work for me, and never work if i remember =(
> Maybe Guru of Network ask me where i have simple stupid mistake?
> 
> In theory
> #cat ffffffff > /proc/irq/ID/smp_affinity
> set mask that all cpus must get interrupts RR
> 
> but i see in cat /proc/interrupts that all interrupts get only CPU0
> On CPU1 0 interrupts
> 
> i do
> #cat 2 > /proc/irq/16/smp_affinity
> #cat 2 > /proc/irq/17/smp_affinity
> #echo /proc/irq/1[67]/smp_affinity
> 00000002
> 00000002
> 
> Great. Interrupts go to CPU1
> 
> #cat 1 > /proc/irq/16/smp_affinity
> #cat 1 > /proc/irq/17/smp_affinity
> #echo /proc/irq/1[67]/smp_affinity
> 00000001
> 00000001
> 
> Great. Interrupts go to CPU0
> 
> #cat 3 > /proc/irq/16/smp_affinity
> #cat 3 > /proc/irq/17/smp_affinity
> #echo /proc/irq/1[67]/smp_affinity
> 00000003
> 00000003
> 
> Strange. Interrupts go to CPU0 only.
> 
> Where i have mistake? Why i not have RR? Or i mistake in SMP 
> Affinity idea? Thanks for answers!
> 
> Slavon
> 
> > Another option is to use recent e1000 nics with multiqueue capability.
> > Read in [2]. Google for more information. I'm not sure but you'll
> > probably need non-kerel recent e1000 drivers from sourceforge.
> >
> > [1]http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > [2]http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/networking/multiqueue.txt
> >
> > cheers,
> > Marek Kierdelewicz
> >
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html