[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080104142733.GA31052@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:27:33 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockless pagecache Cassini regression
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:58:31AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:33:52 +0100
>
> > Just for interest, the lockless pagecache actually makes
> > page->_count unstable for all pages that _have ever_ been pagecache
> > pages (since the last quiescent rcu state, anyway). Basically, it
> > looks up and takes a ref on the struct page without ever having a
> > prior pin or reference on that page. It can do this because it knows
> > the struct page won't actually get freed. After taking the ref, it
> > rechecks that it has got the right page...
>
> Ok, I understand the needs now.
>
> I think the way the drivers/net/niu.c driver handles things
> would work better. It only performs get_page(), atomic
> increments on compound_head(page)->_count, and __free_page().
> Is that all legal with the lockless pagecache?
Yes, you can use the regular refcounting and freeing operations. If the
lockless pagecache has got a speculative reference on the page after the
driver drops all "real" references, it will take care of freeing the page.
> If so I can likely rework the Cassini page management to
> behave similarly.
If you got the chance, that would be very nice.
Thanks,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists