[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080105154805.118eb3d1@vader.jdub.homelinux.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:05 -0600
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibm_newemac: Increase number of default rx-/tx-buffers
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:53:06 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 13:38 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 January 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 10:50 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > > Performance tests done by AMCC have shown that 256 buffer increase the
> > > > performance of the Linux EMAC driver. So let's update the default
> > > > values to match this setup.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Do we have the numbers ? Did they also measure latency ?
> >
> > I hoped this question would not come. ;) No, unfortunately I don't have any
> > numbers. Just the recommendation from AMCC to always use 256 buffers.
>
> Ok. Well, it's just a .config option so I suppose the patch is fine. Can
> you also update the defconfigs (at least for the recent AMCC boards) ?
No need for a defconfig update patch. Paul or I usually do a general
defconfig update for most boards before the next kernel version. This
will get picked up then.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists