netdev - Re: Request to include ESFQ patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <478133A4.4020903@andyfurniss.entadsl.com>
Date:	Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:01:40 +0000
From:	Andy Furniss <lists@...yfurniss.entadsl.com>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugfood-c@...ooh.org
Subject: Re: Request to include ESFQ patch

Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I took risk and installed ESFQ on my main backbone QoS. I found it highly 
> useful, and very need in setup's where is more than 128 flows passing and 
> especially where is nat available.

I agree it will be good when it's in.

> 
> Here is results with overloaded class for low-priority P2P traffic customers:
> 

*sfq was never meant for interactive traffic as such. If you really want 
to do QOS for them you would need to (somehow) classify interactive and 
give it prio over bulk. I know this may not be practical for your setup, 
but what ping times users get will vary depending how many other active 
users there are/queue length/how many tcps the user has open etc.

Andy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html