netdev - Re: [PATCH][VLAN] Merge tree equal tails in vlan_skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4785159D.9090105@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:42:37 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
CC:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][VLAN] Merge tree equal tails in vlan_skb_recv

Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Hi, Patrick.
> 
>> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>> There are tree paths in it, that set the skb->proto and then
>>> perform common receive manipulations (basically call netif_rx()).
>>>
>>> I think, that we can make this code flow easier to understand
>>> by introducing the vlan_set_encap_proto() function (I hope the 
>>> name is good) to setup the skb proto and merge the paths calling 
>>> netif_rx() together.
>>>
>>> Surprisingly, but gcc detects this thing and merges these paths
>>> by itself, so this patch doesn't make the vlan module smaller.
>>
>> I already have something similar queued, but your patch is a nice
>> cleanup on top. I'll merge it into my tree and send it out after
>> some testing, hopefully today.
>>
> 
> What are your plans about this patch? Should I resubmit this one?


Sorry, I'm pretty backlogged from Christmas, but I have your patch
queued and hope to catch up until the end of this week.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html