netdev - Re: make ipv6_sysctl_register to return a value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47849A60.1020909@fr.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:56:48 +0100
From:	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: make ipv6_sysctl_register to return a value

David Miller wrote:
> Why did you post this again?  It's identical to patch 1/9
> from the previous series you sent out.
> 
> This is confusing, since it makes me think you wanted me to
> perhaps do something different or update an already
> submitted patch.

I thought you was expecting a new netns ipv6 sysctl series and ignored 
the current one. While I was looking at them again I found a problem and 
I wanted to fix that before resending. In the meantime, there were three 
independant trivial patches I wanted to send as a pre-requesite for the 
incoming sysctl patches. Bad idea ... :)

  - make ipv6_sysctl_register to return a value
  - make a subsystem for af_inet6
  - add ipv6 structure for netns

With the sysctl Pavel's patch, the first one does not apply.

To clear out any confusion, please can you just ignore all my previous 
patches, I will resend a new serie rebased on the work done by Pavel.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks.

   -- Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html