| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47860025.2040301@bigtelecom.ru> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:23:17 +0300 From: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru> To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: No idea about shaping trough many pc Thanks for answer! 1 PC have more then 15k TC rules.... tc get many cpu si... I don't wont split networks on cisco, becouse i need HA. If PC do shutdown - another must get all function. BGP work great for this solution. But have troubles in control common traffic from users. Will be great if i can create common TC rules that share to all PC and its have common data (statistic, info, tokens, and e.t.c.). Maybe netdev think about system mode that we have one OS on many PC (Like HA Cluster). Linux may do great routing solution! Will be great if all 20 PC may be 1 logical PC that have many CPU and may process lots of interrupts! Thanks =) > For proper link bandwidth sharing i guess something like network counters > have to be shared between PC's (with proper locking). I didn't heard anything > like this > > IMHO a ways to do this: > Split destination network to multiple parts and do routes on Cisco. Let's say > you have: > 192.168.0.0/16 > and u have 4 balancing PC's > total bandwidth 1Gbit/s (speed conforming to IEC 1000Mbit/s in 1Gbit/s) > > Then u do on cisco : > 192.168.0.0/18 via PC1(shared speed 250Mbit/s) > 192.168.64.0/18 via PC2(shared speed 250Mbit/s) > 192.168.128.0/18 via PC3(shared speed 250Mbit/s) > 192.168.192.0/18 via PC4(shared speed 250Mbit/s) > > Probably you can do some scripts to check, if there is in some PC too much > available bandwidth (average 5 minutes), then you can give some other PC > which is need more bandwidth - more bandwidth. For example: > > Average counters for 5minute shows: > PC1 - occupy 100Mbit/s > PC2 - -//- 50Mbit/s > PC3 - -//- 150Mbit/s > PC4 - -//- 230Mbit/s > > Then u change link speed: > PC1 max 200 > PC2 max 150 > PC3 max 250 > PC4 max 400 (100 from PC2 and 50 from PC1) > > Sure PC must be capable to pass this traffic. And my IMHO it is not normal > that your PC's not able to handle more than 200Mbps of traffic. I have > complicated setup, with 4 LAN 8139 cards, which is passing totally 200Mbps > traffic. I am sure it can handle up to 300mbps, but already i am changing it > to PC with PCI-E e1000/broadcom netxtreme with offloading capabilities, large > buffers and proper drivers with NAPI. I have such hardware handling now for > example 160Mbps and counters is: > 12:50:41 CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal > %idle intr/s > 12:50:42 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.24 0.00 > 98.51 4009.90 > 12:50:43 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 0.00 > 98.75 4024.75 > 12:50:44 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 > 98.50 4181.82 > 12:50:45 all 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 > 98.25 4626.73 > 12:50:46 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 > 98.50 4351.52 > 12:50:47 all 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.00 > 98.00 4805.88 > > It is 2.6.23.8 with some mistakes during configuration, i am doing to try > 2.6.24-rc7 and some optimizations. > > Right now profile looks like: > 10957 17.0675 mwait_idle_with_hints > 7454 11.6110 read_hpet > 3883 6.0485 _raw_spin_lock > 1605 2.5001 timer_interrupt > 1363 2.1231 irq_entries_start > > So maybe i will have to try change timers to TSC, disable nmi_watchdog and > try to tune up network driver (bnx2). > Probably you have to check such things too. > > On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:06:35 +0300, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote > >> Hello all. >> I try more then 2 month resolve problem witch my shaping. Maybe you >> can help for me? >> >> Sheme: >> +-------------------+ >> + ----- | Shaping PC 1 | ---------+ >> / +-------------------+ \ >> +--------+ / +--------------------+ \ >> + --------+ | Cisco | +-------- | Shaping PC N | -----------+ -- >> ---| CISCO | +--------+ \ +--------------------+ >> / +---------+ \ +--------- >> ------------+ / + ----- | Shaping PC >> 20 | --------+ +---------------------+ >> >> Network - Over 10k users. Common bandwidth to INTERNET more then 1 >> GBs All computers have BGP and turn on multipath. Cisco can't do >> load sharing by Packet (its can resolve all my problems =((( ). Only >> by DST IP, SRC IP, or +Level4. Ok. User must have speed 1mbs. Lets >> look variants: >> 1. Create rules to user = (1mbs/N computers). If user use N >> connection all great, but if it use 1 connection his speed = 1mbs/N - >> its not look good. All be great if cisco can PER PACKET load >> sharing =( >> 2. Create rules to user = 1mbs. If user use 1 connection all great, >> but if it use N connection his speed much more then needed limit =( >> >> Why i use 20 PC? Becouse 1 pc normal forward 100-150mbs... when it >> have 100% cpu usage on Sofware Interrupts... >> >> Any idea how to resolve this problem? >> >> In my dreams (feature request to netdev ;) ): >> Get PC - title: MASTER TC. All 20 PC syncronize statistic with >> MASTER and have common rules and statistic. Then i use variant 2 and >> will be happy... but its not real? =( Maybe have other variants? >> >> Thanks for help! >> Slavon. >> P.S. Sorry for my english =( >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > > -- > Denys Fedoryshchenko > Technical Manager > Virtual ISP S.A.L. > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists