netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] bonding: 3 fixes for 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080110210353.GI8728@gospo.usersys.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:03:53 -0500
From:	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bonding: 3 fixes for 2.6.24

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:50:46PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:51:44AM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> >>
> >> That wasn't the only purpose, Herbert.  Making sure that calls to
> >> dev_set_mac_address were called from process context was important at
> >> the time of the coding as well since at least the tg3 driver took locks
> >> that could not be taken reliably in soft-irq context.  Michael Chan
> >> fixed this here:
> >
> >Sure, but where do you call that function while holding the bond lock?
> 
> 	If I recall correctly, the problem was that tg3, et al, did
> things that might sleep, and bonding was calling from a timer context,
> which couldn't sleep.  It wasn't about the lock.
> 

Exactly, I was just about to post the same.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html