[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080110.224749.66236050.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:47:49 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vapier@...too.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, klibc@...or.com
Subject: Re: [klibc] [patch] import socket defines
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:23:37 -0500
> On Friday 11 January 2008, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> > > Seems the most logical thing to do would be to break out the small
> > > portion that everyone wants into <linux/sockaddr.h> or somesuch, and
> > > then remove those ifdefs entirely.
> > >
> > > Proposed patch (still being tested) attached...
> >
> > I think this would clearly break existing glibc builds.
> >
> > I agree with fixing the ifdef checks, but not like this.
>
> how ? the large crap in linux/socket.h never made it into glibc builds, and
> the few things at the top which were relocated to linux/sockaddr.h are still
> pulled in via linux/socket.h. for glibc, the resulting '#include
> <linux/socket.h>' should be unchanged.
Hmmm...
Doesn't glibc include linux/socket.h? If so, before it wouldn't get
the sa_family_t et al. defines (because __GLIBC__ will be defined and
it will be >= 2), but with your change it get those things.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists