netdev - Re: [klibc] [patch] import socket defines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:42:28 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	klibc@...or.com
Subject: Re: [klibc] [patch] import socket defines

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> Right now, glibc is special-cased.  glibc also tends to be very 
> deliberate about its kernel header inclusions.  It wants a subset of the 
> available defines, so it can include a subset header.
> 
> The reverse is definitely possible too -- all other users (kernel, 
> newlib, dietlibc, uclibc, and klibc) can change and leave the current 
> state for glibc.
> 
> We can special-case the kernel in the above case, but that would involve 
> some additional ugliness.
> 

Just to clarify: I don't have any strong opinions for any particular 
option -- I'm fine with either.  I'd just like to get rid of the 
ugliness of having #defines for any particular user spaces, and I'd 
prefer two include files over feature test macros.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html