lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1200014246.3861.148.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:17:26 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Ron Rindjunsky <ron.rindjunsky@...el.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: handing cloned frames to netif_rx()?

In 802.11n, there is a case where multiple data frames are received
aggregated into a single frame (A-MSDU).

Currently, we copy each of these frames out into their own skb, but
because of the alignment with that etc. I started to think that we could
simply pass up a clone of the original skb with start/length adjusted
properly so that it windows only the contained packet.

The buffer would be shared but the data within the original window
(starting with the 802.3 header) could even be written to, it won't be
needed again by mac80211 once it's handed off to netif_rx(). The skb
will obviously have lots of head- and tailroom but that space would be
part of other packets.

Is it ok to do this? Will something freak out if we pass a cloned skb to
netif_rx()?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ