[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080111.174109.57502326.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:41:09 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: benny+usenet@...rsen.dk
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e1000 performance issue in 4 simultaneous links
From: Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:09:32 +0100
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>
> > No IRQ balancing should be done at all for networking device
> > interrupts, with zero exceptions. It destroys performance.
>
> Does irqbalanced need to be taught about this?
The userland one already does.
It's only the in-kernel IRQ load balancing for these (presumably
powerpc) platforms that is broken.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists