lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:12:24 +0900 (JST)
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/001] ipv4: enable use of 240/4 address space

In article <> (at Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:48:57 -0800 (PST)), David Miller <> says:

> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:41:20 +0900 (JST)
> > There is no positive consesus on this draft
> > at the intarea meeting in Vancouver, right?
> > 
> > We cannot / should not enable that space until we have reached
> > a consensus on it.
> This is so incredibly incorrect.
> There is consensus on making network stacks able to use this
> address space.  And that is all that the patch does.

No, we did never make consensus on it.

> The consensus is only missing on whether to make the address
> space public or private.
> This is also clearly spelled out in the draft.
> It is important to get as large of a head start on this as
> possible because of how long it takes to deploy something
> like this.

Okay, though I am afraid this space will not be used widely,
we should be ready for it.

I'll make some more comments on the patch itself from
another point view.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists