netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] rose_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47893127.2080606@ccr.jussieu.fr>
Date:	Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:29:11 +0100
From:	Bernard Pidoux <pidoux@....jussieu.fr>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC:	Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] rose_get_route() template



Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Bernard Pidoux a écrit :
>>  From 46bccce1e660a39bcc8f8cf87d4c17de33f4ba48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@...at.org>
>> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:01:46 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] [ROSE] template declaration for rose_get_route()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@...at.org>
>> ---
>>  include/net/rose.h |    1 +
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/rose.h b/include/net/rose.h
>> index e5bb084..d3ab453 100644
>> --- a/include/net/rose.h
>> +++ b/include/net/rose.h
>> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ extern struct net_device *rose_dev_first(void);
>>  extern struct net_device *rose_dev_get(rose_address *);
>>  extern struct rose_route *rose_route_free_lci(unsigned int, struct 
>> rose_neigh *);
>>  extern struct rose_neigh *rose_get_neigh(rose_address *, unsigned 
>> char *, unsigned char *);
>> +extern struct rose_neigh *rose_get_route(rose_address *, unsigned 
>> char *, unsigned char *);
>>  extern int  rose_rt_ioctl(unsigned int, void __user *);
>>  extern void rose_link_failed(ax25_cb *, int);
>>  extern int  rose_route_frame(struct sk_buff *, ax25_cb *);
>> -- 
> 
> Strange... if rose_get_route() is used only in net/rose/rose_route.c, 
> why dont you define it static, and not extern in include/net/rose.h ?
> 
> 
> 

I agree. You are perfectly right.
There is no need to declare rose_get_route() external.
I stupidly copied rose_get_neigh()definition from which I derived 
rose_get_route();

Also I am not sure that setting cause and diagnostic is necessary, as 
they are not used by the calling function.

By the way. I made a typo in [PATCH 4/4].

Instead of "Initial connection to rose neighbour nodes was unusually,
t0 timer was blocked and application program could not
use socket."

One should read
"Initial connection to rose neighbour nodes was unusually,
long, t0 timer was blocked and application program could not
use socket."

Bernard P.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html