netdev - Re: [PATCH 2.6.23+] ingress classify to [nf]mark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <478BE021.1070408@bspu.unibel.by>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:20:17 -0200
From:	Dzianis Kahanovich <mahatma@...u.unibel.by>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	hadi@...erus.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23+] ingress classify to [nf]mark

jamal wrote:

May be I am mix in mind other code (multi-class loop/walking) and this code. I 
am deprogramming... ;)

>> Sorry, I just change focus from existing "tc_index=..." to common behaviour ;)
> 
>> [...]
>>> Please refer to what i said above; if what i said still doesnt make
>>> sense i can create (the simple) patch.
>> A bit vague... sorry...
> 
> I mean:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> .... leave this part alone which already sets tc_index ...
> #else
> ...set tc_index and mark here ...
> #endif
> 
> And when we have a metadata action - we remove setting of tc_index from
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> 
> Did that make sense?

After current "#endif" - may be.

What "result" are with:
1) no filters?
2) 1 filter only, with "action continue"?

-- 
WBR,
Denis Kaganovich,  mahatma@...by  http://mahatma.bspu.unibel.by
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html