lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:15:42 +0800
From:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <>
To:	LKML <>
Cc:	Ilpo Järvinen <>,
	Netdev <>,
	Herbert Xu <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>
Subject: Re: Netperf TCP_RR(loopback) 10% regression in
	2.6.24-rc6,	comparing with 2.6.22

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 08:34 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 21:53 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:44:40AM +0000, Ilpo Jrvinen wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I tried to use bisect to locate the bad patch between 2.6.22 and 2.6.23-rc1,
> > > > > but the bisected kernel wasn't stable and went crazy.
> > > 
> > > TCP work between that is very much non-existing.
> > 
> > Make sure you haven't switched between SLAB/SLUB while testing this.
> I can make sure. In addition, I tried both SLAB and SLUB and make sure the 
> regression is still there if CONFIG_SLAB=y.
I retried bisect between 2.6.22 and 2.6.23-rc1. This time, I enabled CONFIG_SLAB=y,
and deleted the warmup procedure in the testing scripts. In addition, bind the 2
processes on the same logical processor. The regression is about 20% which is larger
than the one when binding 2 processes to different core.

The new bisect reported cfs core patch causes it. The results of every step look

dd41f596cda0d7d6e4a8b139ffdfabcefdd46528 is first bad commit
commit dd41f596cda0d7d6e4a8b139ffdfabcefdd46528
Author: Ingo Molnar <>
Date:   Mon Jul 9 18:51:59 2007 +0200

    sched: cfs core code
    apply the CFS core code.
    this change switches over the scheduler core to CFS's modular
    design and makes use of kernel/sched_fair/rt/idletask.c to implement
    Linux's scheduling policies.
    thanks to Andrew Morton and Thomas Gleixner for lots of detailed review
    feedback and for fixlets.
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <>
    Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <>
    Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <>
    Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <>


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists