netdev - Re: [PATCH] bluetooth : move children of connection device to NULL before connection down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1200982696.7978.148.camel@aeonflux>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:18:16 +0100
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	hidave.darkstar@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bluez-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	cornelia.huck@...ibm.com, gombasg@...aki.hu, htejun@...il.com,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, kay.sievers@...y.org, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth : move children of connection device to NULL
	before connection down

Hi Dave,

> > Add people missed in cc-list.
> 
> Thanks Dave for your continued efforts on Bluetooth bugs like this.
> 
> Marcel, are you going to review/ACK/integrate/push-upstream/whatever
> any of these Bluetooth patches?
> 
> It hasn't been getting much love from you as of late, you are one of
> the listed maintainers, and I don't want to lose any of Dave's
> valuable bug fixing work.

I will be fully back in business next week. Just got stuck in a project
that needed 200% of my time to get it going.

> Or should I just handle it all directly?

I followed the list only a little bit, but from what I have seen is that
Dave is doing a great job in tracking all issues down to the real cause.

I had a look at his last patch and after review, I agree that this is a
possible solution. I only have two nitpicks about the coding style. So
in del_conn the struct device declaration should be made after the
struct hci_conn assignment from the container and I would put an extra
empty line before the devel_del, put_device block. Nitpicks only.

Right now I can't think of any side effects by this patch. Actually I
only see an improvement with this patch. So please take it directly and
starting with next week, I gonna make sure that they are handled again
properly by me.

Regards

Marcel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html