[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201048944.3151.263.camel@ymzhang>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:42:24 +0800
From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Netperf TCP_RR(loopback) 10%
regression in 2.6.24-rc6, comparing with 2.6.22
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 10:36 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> When parsing the -P option in scan_socket_args() of src/nettest_bsd.c,
> netperf is using "break_args()" from src/netsh.c which indeed if the
> command line says "-P 12345" will set both the local and remote port
> numbers to 12345. If instead you were to say "-P 12345," it will use
> 12345 only for the netperf side. If you say "-P ,12345" it will use
> 12345 only for the netserver side. To set both sides at once to
> different values it would be "-P 12345,54321"
>
> In theory, send_udp_rr() in src/nettest_bsd.c (or I suppose
> scan_socket_args() could have more code added to it to check for a UDP
> test over loopback, but probably needs to be a check for any local IP,
> and unless this becomes something bigger than "Doctor! Doctor! It hurts
> when I do this!" :) I'm inclined to leave it as caveat benchmarker and
> perhaps some additional text in the manual.
I will instrument kernel to see if kernel does work like it is expected.
When an issue is found, we shouldn't escape by saying it's nothing to do
with me.
-yanmin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists