[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4798E32E.6080003@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:12:46 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Ivan Dichev <idichev@....bg>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Slow OOM in netif_RX function
Ivan Dichev a écrit :
> Hello,
> I got problem with my linux router. It has slow persistent OOM
> problems from few months ago.
> Every working(I mean days when more traffic is generated) day my
> router is leaking with 15-20 MB memory and
> after 2 weeks the restart is a MUST.
>>>From /proc/slabinfo I saw that size-2048 and size-512 are growing
> rapidly every day when traffic occur.
>
> --------- /proc/slabinfo --------------------
> size-2048 20322 20349 2072 3 2 : tunables 24
> 12 0 : slabdata 6780 6783 0
> size-512 50984 51016 536 7 1 : tunables 32
> 16 0 : slabdata 7288 7288 0
>
>
> I was wondering who is allocating this mem pools and then I changed
> the kernel with 2.6.23-rc12 including options
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK=y
>
>
> Unfortunately changing the kernel didn't solve the mem leak....
> Now /proc/slab_allocators is showing that 3c59x driver is allocating
> 2048 and 512 bytes memory pools
> caused by RX function.
> --------- from /proc/slab_allocators ------------------------------
> 7612 size-2048: boomerang_rx+0x33b/0x437 [3c59x]
> 16018 size-512: boomerang_rx+0x165/0x437 [3c59x]
>
> I was thinking that the 3com driver is bogus, .. but not!
> After few days I changed the cards with rtl8139 and now ....
> --------- from /proc/slab_allocators ------------------------------
> size-2048: 20159 rtl8139_rx+0x155/0x2dc [8139too]
> size-1024: 2693 rtl8139_rx+0x155/0x2dc [8139too]
> size-512: 50515 rtl8139_rx+0x155/0x2dc [8139too]
>
> the memory leak appear again in the same function(RX).
>
> I did search over the mailing list and found as similar only this
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/old/2003-q4/msg03071.html
>
>
> For sure it does not depend on kernel version and network
> driver(except case if both drivers are bogus :)
> Any ideas ?
>
Could you post your iptable rules "iptables -t nat -nvL ; iptables -nvL", and
full "cat /proc/slabinfo" ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists