netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9816] New: cannot replace route

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080127075843.GA2633@ami.dom.local>
Date:	Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:58:43 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
Cc:	Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9816] New: cannot replace route

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:11:26AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> But comment#3 is "ambiguous"... It looks like you don't want to show
> us too much... So, apparently you change the route, but it seems this
> route exists; you have this:
>   10.0.0.0/8 dev eth0  scope link 
> but probably also something like this:
>   default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 src 10.204.0.116
> 
> So, I doubt there is any "real" change attempted here. It looks more
> like a question if program should allow for changing the form of route
> entries even if they mean the same, and if this should be reported as
> error at all? But maybe I miss something...

...But, on the other hand, default route shoudn't affect adding or
changing specific routes, so this behaviour is wrong, and IMHO this
change should be reverted or fixed.

Regards,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html