netdev - Re: Udev coldplugging loads 8139too driver instead of 8139cp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801300036390.14907@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:37:20 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
cc:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
	Frederik Himpe <fhimpe@...enet.be>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Udev coldplugging loads 8139too driver instead of 8139cp


On Jan 29 2008 18:34, Jon Masters wrote:
>On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 03:46 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> Udev in fact loads both - 8139cp and 8139too.  The difference is the ORDER
>> in which it loads them - if for "cp-handled" hardware it first loads "too",
>> too will complain as above and will NOT claim the device.  The same is
>> true for the opposite.
>[...]
>> In short: NotABug, or ComplainToRealtec (but that's waaaay too late and
>> will not help anyway) ;)
>
>Nah. It's a "bug" insomuch as we don't handle multiple matching aliases
>very well, and it's becoming more common, so we probably should :)

Why not combine 8139cp.c and 8139too.c?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html