[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A04C07.1040200@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:05:59 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Mostly revert "e1000/e1000e: Move PCI-Express device IDs over
to e1000e"
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Andrew was concerned about this when the driver was in -mm.
>> He asked for a patch that would set E1000E to same value as E1000
>> and I supplied that. Auke acked it IIRC. Other people vetoed it. :(
>
> Yeah, I've been discussing with Jeff and the gang.
>
> I think we have agreed on a solution where the ID's show up in the old
> driver if the new driver is not enabled at all.
>
> (And as a side note: it turns out that the problem I experienced didn't
> come from the new e1000e driver after all, so I'll be removing the
> EXPERIMENTAL flag again).
>
> So I'd suggest the final patch be something like this, but I'm sendign it
> out just as an example of how we could solve this, not necessarily as a
> final patch.
>
> Jeff, Auke, would something like this be acceptable? It makes it very
> obvious in the driver table which entries are for the PCIE versions that
> would be handled by the E1000E driver if it is enabled..
>
> Untested, but as mentioned, this is more of a "this looks maintainable and
> like it should solve the issues" rather than anything I was planning on
> committing now.
>
> Linus
> ---
> drivers/net/Kconfig | 5 ++-
> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> index 5a2d1dd..6c57540 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> @@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ config E1000_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT
>
> config E1000E
> tristate "Intel(R) PRO/1000 PCI-Express Gigabit Ethernet support"
> - depends on PCI && EXPERIMENTAL
> + depends on PCI
> ---help---
> This driver supports the PCI-Express Intel(R) PRO/1000 gigabit
> ethernet family of adapters. For PCI or PCI-X e1000 adapters,
> @@ -2009,6 +2009,9 @@ config E1000E
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here. The module
> will be called e1000e.
>
> +config E1000E_ENABLED
> + def_bool E1000E != n
> +
> config IP1000
> tristate "IP1000 Gigabit Ethernet support"
> depends on PCI && EXPERIMENTAL
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index 3111af6..8c87940 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ static const char e1000_copyright[] = "Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation
> * Macro expands to...
> * {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, device_id)}
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_E1000E_ENABLED
> + #define PCIE(x)
> +#else
> + #define PCIE(x) x,
> +#endif
Patch gets my ACK, if you like, though an improvement would be to have
your Kconfig logic activate CONFIG_E1000_PCIEX. Then future janitors
could come along and disable unused code in addition to PCI IDs.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists