netdev - RE: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52044F8F22@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:33:20 -0800
From:	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To:	"Carsten Aulbert" <carsten.aulbert@....mpg.de>
Cc:	"Bruce Allen" <ballen@...vity.phys.uwm.edu>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Henning Fehrmann" <henning.fehrmann@....mpg.de>,
	"Bruce Allen" <bruce.allen@....mpg.de>
Subject: RE: e1000 full-duplex TCP performance well below wire speed

Carsten Aulbert wrote:
> PS: Am I right that the TCP_RR tests should only be run on a single
> node at a time, not on both ends simultaneously?

yes, they are a request/response test, and so perform the bidirectional
test with a single node starting the test.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html