lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A2701B.4040104@andyfurniss.entadsl.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:04:27 +0000
From:	Andy Furniss <lists@...yfurniss.entadsl.com>
To:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
CC:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable TSO for non standard qdiscs

Rick Jones wrote:

> then the qdisc could/should place a cap on the size of a 'TSO' based on 
> the bitrate (and perhaps input as to how much time any one "burst" of 
> data should be allowed to consume on the network) and pass that up the 
> stack?  right now you seem to be proposing what is effectively a cap of 
> 1 MSS.

I don't have any gig nics to test, so this is not a rhetorical question.

How does tcp congestion control behave when a tc qdisc drops a big 
unsegmented TSO skb?

Andy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ