[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:23:36 -0800
From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@...ooh.org>
To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel panic on 2.6.24 with esfq patch applied
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> Hi
>
> Probably bug related to ESFQ, now i will unload module and will test more.
> But probably not related, so if not difficult, please take a look.
>
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER [12380.067104] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
> pointer dereference
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER at virtual address 00000008
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER [12380.067140] printing eip: c01f10ed
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER *pde = 00000000
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER [12380.067162] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER SMP
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER [12380.067181] Modules linked in:
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER netconsole
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER configfs
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER iTCO_wdt
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER nf_nat_pptp
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER nf_conntrack_pptp
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER nf_conntrack_proto_gre
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER nf_nat_proto_gre
> Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER sch_esfq
I'd rather you were using my recent patches to SFQ instead of ESFQ. I
was able to crash a 2.6.24 user-mode Linux with ESFQ as well; I don't
know if that's what you encountered, but the SFQ patches should be
better anyway.
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/sfq-2.6.24.tar.bz2
http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/
-Corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists