[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080202221502.76d48ead.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 22:15:02 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] request_irq() always returns -EINVAL with a NULL
handler.
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:57:58 +1100 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> I assume that these ancient network drivers were trying to find out if
> an irq is available. eepro.c expecting +EBUSY was doubly wrong.
>
> I'm not sure that can_request_irq() is the right thing, but these drivers
> are definitely wrong.
>
> request_irq should BUG() on bad input, and these would have been found
> earlier.
This breaks non-CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS architectures.
alpha:
drivers/net/3c503.c: In function 'el2_open':
drivers/net/3c503.c:382: error: implicit declaration of function 'can_request_irq'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists