[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47A7540E.2010400@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:06:06 -0600
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Doug Maxey <dwm@...yolf.org>
CC: Doug Maxey <dwm@...tin.ibm.com>,
Linux PowerPC List <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...zik.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ehea: fix phyp checkpatch complaints
Doug Maxey wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:23:45 CST, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:20:50PM -0600, Doug Maxey wrote:
>>> /* input param R5 */
>>> -#define H_ALL_RES_QP_EQPO EHEA_BMASK_IBM(9, 11)
> ...
>>> +#define H_ALL_RES_QP_EQPO EHEA_BMASK_IBM(9, 11)
> ...
>> This was better the way it was (before, it was readable at any tab setting);
>> checkpatch is overeager to complain on tab/space issues (it's a bit hard to
>> distinguish indentation from alignment with a regex).
>
> In emacs, with no special offsets, the lines appear to still line up.
Are you using a tab size other than 8?
> What did happen was spaces were turned to tabs where applicable.
I disagree about the applicability. :-)
> What editor shows a bad alignment?
Any editor that has been configured to a non-default tab size.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists