netdev - Re: [patch 2/4] forcedeth: fix MAC address detection on network card (regression in 2.6.23)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:42:01 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	michael.pyne@...mail.net, AAbdulla@...dia.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] forcedeth: fix MAC address detection on network card
 (regression in 2.6.23)

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>
>> NAK - this fixes one set of users, and breaks a working set of users.
>>
>> Need to add DMI check for the specific motherboard (dmi_check_system), 
>> and flip flag according to success/failure of that check.
>>
> 
> Either that, or detect the Gigabyte prefix used as a suffix, since they 
> seem to be the source of this particular f*ckup.

Indeed, that would work too...  though we would need to put out a call 
for Gigabyte testers during 2.6.25-rc.

It is an entirely reasonable scenario for NVIDIA to deploy a fix to 
Gigabyte, which would then return us to the same scenario we have today: 
  some work and some don't.

That's my main reason for leaning more conservative here.

	Jeff




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html