[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080205.030547.156453415.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:05:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, nwfilardo@...il.com, jeff@...zik.org,
maxk@...lcomm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] tun: impossible to deassert IFF_ONE_QUEUE or
IFF_NO_PI
From: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:45:21 -0800
> From: "Nathaniel Filardo" <nwfilardo@...il.com>
>
> Taken from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9806
>
> The TUN/TAP driver only permits one-way transitions of IFF_NO_PI or
> IFF_ONE_QUEUE during the lifetime of a tap/tun interface. Note that
> tun_set_iff contains
>
> 541 if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_NO_PI)
> 542 tun->flags |= TUN_NO_PI;
> 543
> 544 if (ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_ONE_QUEUE)
> 545 tun->flags |= TUN_ONE_QUEUE;
>
> This is easily fixed by adding else branches which clear these bits.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> This is easily reproduced by setting an interface persistant using tunctl then
> attempting to open it as IFF_TAP or IFF_TUN, without asserting the IFF_NO_PI
> flag. The ioctl() will succeed and the ifr.flags word is not modified, but the
> interface remains in IFF_NO_PI mode (as it was set by tunctl).
>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Acked-by: Maxim Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists