[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0802070648020.547@force5.casita.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:52:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Rick Troth <rmt@...ita.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ursula Braun <braunu@...ibm.com>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Tiedemann <ptiedem@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] ctcm: infrastructure for replaced ctc driver
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
...
> > +/*
> > + * drivers/s390/net/ctcm_dbug.c
> > + *
> > + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2001, 2007
> > + * Authors: Peter Tiedemann (ptiedem@...ibm.com)
> > + *
> > + */
>
> Please don't mention filenames in the top of file comments.
> On the other hand a little description of what this file
> does would be quite useful. (This comment applies to all
> files in this patch)
Better descriptions, yes. Of course.
But are you saying to NOT name the file in its comments?
I am surprised. If I am reading correctly, then I disagree.
Is the exclusion of the name of the source file from its comments
a stylistic decision the other kernel developers have agreed to?
Or is it tied to automation? Or have I (hopefully) misunderstood?
-- R; <><
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists