[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080208155416.GB12085@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:54:16 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frank.Blaschka@...ibm.com
Cc: jgarzik@...ox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] qeth: new qeth device driver
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 03:10:00PM +0100, Frank.Blaschka@...ibm.com wrote:
> From: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@...ibm.com>
>
> List of major changes and improvements:
> no manipulation of the global ARP constructor
> clean code split into core, layer 2 and layer 3 functionality
> better exploitation of the ethtool interface
> better representation of the various hardware capabilities
> fix packet socket support (tcpdump), no fake_ll required
> osasnmpd notification via udev events
> coding style and beautification
One question below...
> Signed-off-by: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@...ibm.com>
> ---
[ . . . ]
> +static void qeth_l3_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev, unsigned short vid)
> +{
> + struct net_device *vlandev;
> + struct qeth_card *card = (struct qeth_card *) dev->priv;
> + struct in_device *in_dev;
> +
> + if (card->info.type == QETH_CARD_TYPE_IQD)
> + return;
> +
> + vlandev = vlan_group_get_device(card->vlangrp, vid);
> + vlandev->neigh_setup = qeth_l3_neigh_setup;
> +
> + in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(vlandev);
Is this really in an RCU read-side critical section? Or is this just
using common code?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists