[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47AF3D7E.9050102@free.fr>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:07:58 +0100
From: Bernard Pidoux F6BVP <f6bvp@...e.fr>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Jann Traschewski <jann@....de>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AX25] ax25_ds_timer: use mod_timer instead of add_timer
Hi Jarek,
Sorry, I should have been more explicit about the patches I applied.
My CPU is an Intel Core 2 duo and I compiled 2.6.24 with SMP option.
I applied 3 patches you have submitted for ax25 before I observed the
possible locking.
That is :
mkiss patch
diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/mkiss.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/mkiss.c
index cfcd15a..30c9b3b 100644
[AX25] ax25_timer: use mod_timer instead of add_timer
[AX25] ax25_ds_timer: use mod_timer instead of add_timer
I also applied 4 patches for rose.ko I sent to the list a while ago.
But for this report I did not installed any ROSE driver nor application.
I will try your new patch version 2 and report any possible change.
Regards,
Bernard Pidoux,
F6BVP
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:44:50PM +0100, Bernard Pidoux F6BVP wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With AX25 patches applied I still get this possible circular locking
>> message.
>
> Hi Bernard,
>
> Could you confirm which exactly patches did you try? Is this vanilla
> 2.6.24 plus these two: ax25_timer and ax25_ds_timer or something more?
> And I'm not sure what do you mean by "still": the warning came back
> just after these last patches? At least these timer patches don't seem
> to change anything around locking?
>
> Thanks for testing this,
> Jarek P.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists