[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <939d53060802140856v5168a4a2md8c8ed3fad6798e4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:56:53 +0100
From: "Benjamin Thery" <ben.thery@...il.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] race in generic address resolution
Hi,
It seems this patch hangs my machine very quickly when there are some
ICMPv6 traffic.
I'm using net-2.6, pulled today (14th Feb).
I had some unexpected hangs on my SMP test machines and I bisected the
problem to 69cc64d8d92bf852f933e90c888dfff083bd4fc9
"[NDISC]: Fix race in generic address resolution".
Looks like a deadlock:
"BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0]"
Here are some traces printed on the console:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.25-rc1-netns-00113-g69cc64d-dirty #34)
EIP: 0060:[<c02eb5f6>] EFLAGS: 00000287 CPU: 0
EIP is at __write_lock_failed+0xa/0x20
EAX: c7b3fab4 EBX: c7b3fab4 ECX: 00000000 EDX: c0377986
ESI: c7b3fa90 EDI: c7b6f290 EBP: c03cbd24 ESP: c03cbd24
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: b7f9b404 CR3: 07ac8000 CR4: 00000690
DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
DR6: 00000000 DR7: 00000000
[<c020e43f>] _raw_write_lock+0x57/0x6c
[<c02eba95>] _write_lock_bh+0x25/0x2d
[<c026b107>] ? neigh_resolve_output+0x93/0x238
[<c026b107>] neigh_resolve_output+0x93/0x238
[<c02a5635>] ip6_output2+0x241/0x289
[<c02a61cd>] ip6_output+0xa92/0xaad
[<c025ff11>] ? __alloc_skb+0x4f/0xfb
[<c02b2596>] ? __ndisc_send+0x1fb/0x3f5
[<c02b26a0>] __ndisc_send+0x305/0x3f5
[<c02b2fb5>] ndisc_send_ns+0x63/0x6e
[<c02b3f3e>] ndisc_solicit+0x183/0x18d
[<c0121071>] ? __mod_timer+0x96/0xa1
[<c026b81e>] neigh_timer_handler+0x214/0x252
[<c0120c90>] run_timer_softirq+0xfe/0x159
[<c026b60a>] ? neigh_timer_handler+0x0/0x252
[<c011dbfa>] __do_softirq+0x6f/0xe9
[<c011dcae>] do_softirq+0x3a/0x52
[<c011dfc3>] irq_exit+0x44/0x46
[<c0105273>] do_IRQ+0x5a/0x73
[<c0103666>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
[<c0101954>] ? default_idle+0x4a/0x77
[<c010190a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x77
[<c0101855>] cpu_idle+0x89/0x9d
[<c02e6135>] rest_init+0x49/0x4b
=======================
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0]
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.25-rc1-netns-00113-g69cc64d-dirty #34)
EIP: 0060:[<c02eb5f6>] EFLAGS: 00000287 CPU: 1
EIP is at __write_lock_failed+0xa/0x20
EAX: c7b3fab4 EBX: c7b3fab4 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
ESI: c03bb9c0 EDI: c7b3fab4 EBP: c7841eb0 ESP: c7841eb0
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: 08560008 CR3: 07b04000 CR4: 00000690
DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
DR6: 00000000 DR7: 00000000
[<c020e43f>] _raw_write_lock+0x57/0x6c
[<c02eba68>] _write_lock+0x20/0x28
[<c026982c>] ? neigh_periodic_timer+0x99/0x142
[<c026982c>] neigh_periodic_timer+0x99/0x142
[<c0120c90>] run_timer_softirq+0xfe/0x159
[<c0269793>] ? neigh_periodic_timer+0x0/0x142
[<c011dbfa>] __do_softirq+0x6f/0xe9
[<c011dcae>] do_softirq+0x3a/0x52
[<c011dfc3>] irq_exit+0x44/0x46
[<c010d680>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x71/0x81
[<c0103747>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x33/0x38
[<c0101954>] ? default_idle+0x4a/0x77
[<c010190a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x77
[<c0101855>] cpu_idle+0x89/0x9d
=======================
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0]
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.25-rc1-netns-00113-g69cc64d-dirty #34)
EIP: 0060:[<c02eb5f6>] EFLAGS: 00000287 CPU: 0
EIP is at __write_lock_failed+0xa/0x20
EAX: c7b3fab4 EBX: c7b3fab4 ECX: 00000000 EDX: c0377986
ESI: c7b3fa90 EDI: c7b6f290 EBP: c03cbd24 ESP: c03cbd24
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: b7f9b404 CR3: 07ac8000 CR4: 00000690
DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
DR6: 00000000 DR7: 00000000
[<c020e43f>] _raw_write_lock+0x57/0x6c
[<c02eba95>] _write_lock_bh+0x25/0x2d
[<c026b107>] ? neigh_resolve_output+0x93/0x238
[<c026b107>] neigh_resolve_output+0x93/0x238
[<c02a5635>] ip6_output2+0x241/0x289
[<c02a61cd>] ip6_output+0xa92/0xaad
[<c025ff11>] ? __alloc_skb+0x4f/0xfb
[<c02b2596>] ? __ndisc_send+0x1fb/0x3f5
[<c02b26a0>] __ndisc_send+0x305/0x3f5
[<c02b2fb5>] ndisc_send_ns+0x63/0x6e
[<c02b3f3e>] ndisc_solicit+0x183/0x18d
[<c0121071>] ? __mod_timer+0x96/0xa1
[<c026b81e>] neigh_timer_handler+0x214/0x252
[<c0120c90>] run_timer_softirq+0xfe/0x159
[<c026b60a>] ? neigh_timer_handler+0x0/0x252
[<c011dbfa>] __do_softirq+0x6f/0xe9
[<c011dcae>] do_softirq+0x3a/0x52
[<c011dfc3>] irq_exit+0x44/0x46
[<c0105273>] do_IRQ+0x5a/0x73
[<c0103666>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
[<c0101954>] ? default_idle+0x4a/0x77
[<c010190a>] ? default_idle+0x0/0x77
[<c0101855>] cpu_idle+0x89/0x9d
[<c02e6135>] rest_init+0x49/0x4b
=======================
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0]
...
Benjamin
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 6:47 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Frank Blaschka <blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:01:20 +0100
>
>
> > we run your patch during the weekend on single CPU and SMP
> > machines. We do not see any problems. Thanks for providing the fix.
>
> Thanks for testing Frank, I can now push this fix upstream.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists