[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3740A925537C481CAA40DE393FA0D00E@intranet.dti2.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:02:05 +0100
From: "Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]" <jorge@...2.net>
To: "Ferenc Wagner" <wferi@...f.hu>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ipv6 debugging
This sounds to me like the same problem that I was having with OSPF, I
think ARP(6) uses multicast ethernet address too. Can you try if the patch
below, that I sent Patrick McHardy some days ago, fixes your problem?
Regards,
Jorge
---
Hi Patrick,
Commit a0a400d79e3dd7843e7e81baa3ef2957bdc292d0 from you
introduced a new field "da_synced" to struct dev_addr_list that is
not properly initialized to 0. So when any of the current users (8021q,
macvlan, mac80211) calls dev_mc_sync/unsync they mess the address
list for both devices.
The attached patch fixed it for me and avoid future problems.
Regards,
Jorge
Signed-off-by: Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] jorge@...2.net
---
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 9549417..f1b6708 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2900,7 +2900,7 @@ int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, int
*count,
}
}
- da = kmalloc(sizeof(*da), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ da = kzalloc(sizeof(*da), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (da == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
memcpy(da->da_addr, addr, alen);
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ferenc Wagner" <wferi@...f.hu>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 3:06 PM
Subject: ipv6 debugging
> Hi,
>
> I'm kindly asking for some debugging tips with the following problem:
> a machine is running Linux 2.6.24.2, several 802.1q VLAN-s over
> active/backup bonding over two physical interfaces. Everything is
> allright, except for after a reboot, there's no IPv6, while IPv4
> works. The router's ARP(6) table is empty, the machine doesn't answer
> ping6. However, if I start tcpdump -i bond0 ip6, everything is
> allright again. There are some indications that after some period
> without IPv6 traffic, the same can happen again. Are there known
> issues which can exhibit themselves like this? Other very similar
> setups don't show this erratic behaviour.
>
> I know that the above doesn't give a fully detailed picture, but
> thought that I'd better ask before taking the setup into pieces.
> --
> Thanks for your thoughts,
> Feri.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists