netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/04] smc91x: pass along private data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:42:44 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
To:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/04] smc91x: pass along private data

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Magnus Damm wrote:

> Pass a private data pointer to macros and functions. This makes it easy
> to later on make run time decisions. This patch does not change any logic.
> These changes should be optimized away during compilation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>
> ---
> --- 0001/drivers/net/smc91x.c
> +++ work/drivers/net/smc91x.c	2008-02-20 16:52:48.000000000 +0900
> @@ -220,23 +220,23 @@ static void PRINT_PKT(u_char *buf, int l
>  
>  
>  /* this enables an interrupt in the interrupt mask register */
> -#define SMC_ENABLE_INT(x) do {						\
> +#define SMC_ENABLE_INT(priv, x) do {					\
>  	unsigned char mask;						\
> -	spin_lock_irq(&lp->lock);					\
> -	mask = SMC_GET_INT_MASK();					\
> +	spin_lock_irq(&priv->lock);					\
> +	mask = SMC_GET_INT_MASK(priv);					\

Since "lp" is already used all over the place, could you simply use "lp" 
for the macro argument name as well instead of "priv"?  This will make 
the code more uniform and reduce the patch size.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html