[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BC550D.7040003@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:27:57 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...i.umich.edu>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Mark buffer used for debug printks with __maybe_unused
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 07:29 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>>
>>> fs/nfsd/nfsproc.c: char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN];
>>> Perhaps there should be a DECLARE_RPC_BUF(buf) macro?
>>> #define DECLARE_RPC_BUF(var) char var[MAC_BUF_SIZE] __maybe_unused
>>>
>> Make that:
>>
>> #define DECLARE_RPC_BUF(var) char var[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN] __maybe_unuse
OK, I'll send the patch in a moment.
> Alternatively change the dprintk macro to behave similar like
This is too heavy. The problem is that some arguments passed to this
function exist only under appropriate ifdefs, so having a static
inline there will produce a warning :(
> pr_debug() and mark things like svc_print_addr() __pure, which
> has the advantage that is still performs format checking even
> if debugging is disabled.
Taking my above statement into account, this becomes useless, since
svc_print_addr() is used inside those "empty" macros and are complied
out automatically.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists