[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1203528204.7181.193.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:23:24 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...i.umich.edu>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Mark buffer used for debug printks
with __maybe_unused
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 12:02 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > #ifdef DEBUG
> > #define some_print_wrapper(fmt, arg...) \
> > do { if (0) printk(KERN_DEBUG fmt, ##arg); } while (0)
> > #else
> > #define some_print_wrapper(fmt, arg...) \
> > printk(KERN_DEBUG fmt, ##arg)
> > #endif
> Have you actually read include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h?
Yes, I have.
What's there:
#define dfprintk(fac, args...) do ; while (0)
vs what's suggested:
#define dfprintk(fac, args...) \
do { if (0) printk(##args); } while (0);
No argument verification is done to args
There has been code that fails to compile with -DDEBUG when
the code use two different #ifdef DEBUG #else macros.
I think some of the USB code was reworked because of that.
The extra verification is just a guard against bad arguments
when compiled normally. It's similar to what's done in kernel.h
pr_debug without the __attribute__((format(printf,x,y))) so
that calls made as arguments to functions aren't called
unnecessarily.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists