netdev - Re: [NETFILTER]: Introduce nf_inet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1203594725.15409.48.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:52:05 +0900
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, varekova@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [NETFILTER]: Introduce nf_inet_address


On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 15:45 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> That would break iptables compilation, which already includes
> linux/in.h in some files. I guess the best fix for now is to
> include netinet/in.h in busybox and long-term clean this up
> properly.

Yeah, that makes sense.

Can we push the change to __u32 (or uint32_t) for 2.6.24? Or is there
something obvious we should be doing in busybox which we aren't? I don't
quite understand why this u_int32_t crap doesn't work at _all_ when it
evidently used to at least in some environments.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html