[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47BEE36A.2080600@trash.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:59:54 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, varekova@...hat.com,
twoerner@...hat.com,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NETFILTER]: Introduce nf_inet_address
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 16:52 +0900, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> It looks like iptables is fairly broken anyway:
>>
>> make[1]: Entering directory
>> `/home/dwmw2/working/extras/iptables/devel/iptables-1.4.0'
>> Unable to resolve dependency on linux/compiler.h. Try 'make clean'.
>
> And if I move away the contents of the local include/linux/ directory
> and replace it with proper headers generated by 'make
> headers_install' (which won't be trying to include compiler.h), then I
> get more failures:
>
> Unable to resolve dependency on ../include/linux/netfilter/xt_u32.h. Try 'make clean'.
> Unable to resolve dependency on linux/netfilter/xt_time.h. Try 'make clean'.
> Unable to resolve dependency on linux/netfilter/xt_quota.h. Try 'make clean'.
> Unable to resolve dependency on ../include/linux/netfilter/xt_connlimit.h. Try 'make clean'.
> Unable to resolve dependency on linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6t_mh.h. Try 'make clean'.
> Unable to resolve dependency on linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h. Try 'make clean'.
Yes, the dependency tracking has always been a bit strange/broken.
The next release will use autoconf, which will hopefully behave
better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists