[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C46332.7040403@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:06:26 -0800
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...dentenwerk.mhn.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: problems with e1000 and flow control
Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> Wolfgang Walter wrote:
>> it seems that e1000 enables flow-control (rx pause frames) even if
>> the switch does not advertise flow control. This seems to get a
>> problem as (at least some) switches then forward pause frames
>> directed to the card from other hosts. We think there are hosts which
>> indeed do this in the lans of our student halls.
>>
>> I think flow control should be completely disabled by default if the
>> switch does not advertise it. It still can be forced with ethtool.
>
> We agree, and our latest standalone drivers have taken this into
> account, but the kernel drivers have not been updated all the way yet to
> fix this issue.
ok, that explains what is going on :)
I'll take a look into getting these changes upstream. Perhaps Wolfgang can confirm
that the driver on e1000.sf.net is properly working for him?
Auke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists