[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080226.231044.132522648.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:10:44 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: xemul@...nvz.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.26 0/5][SYSCTL]: Make some sysctl RO in net
namespaces.
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:54:55 +0300
> So, here's the patchset, that allows to create ctl tables, that are
> read-only in some namespace in general (and in some net namespace in
> particular). I tried to make it work the way not to consume extra
> memory at run time.
These changes look great.
> This patchset is related to net namespaces only, but on the other hand
> it affects the core sysctl engine. What is your opinion about this set:
> should I send these patches (or some of them) to Andrew instead and wait
> till it appears in mainline (and sequentially in net tree) or will you
> accept this one in net-2.6.26?
What we should do is get patches 1-3 reviewed on linux-kernel and then
into linux-next somehow (perhaps there is some FS tree?).
Once that happens, I can get net-2.6.26 going and put patch 4 and 5 in
there.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists