[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802271041140.20599@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:43:32 +0200 (EET)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] Swap over NFS -v16
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Humm, and here I sit staring at the screen. Perhaps I should go get my
> morning juice, but...
>
> if (mem_reserve_kmalloc_charge(my_res, sizeof(*foo), 0)) {
> foo = kmalloc(sizeof(*foo), gfp|__GFP_MEMALLOC)
> if (!kmem_is_emergency(foo))
> mem_reserve_kmalloc_charge(my_res, -sizeof(*foo), 0)
> } else
> foo = kmalloc(sizeof(*foo), gfp);
>
> Just doesn't look too pretty..
>
> And needing to always account the allocation seems wrong.. but I'll take
> poison and see if that wakes up my mind.
Hmm, perhaps this is just hand-waving but why don't you have a
kmalloc_reserve() function in SLUB that does the accounting properly?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists