[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C704DB.2090101@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:00:43 -0600
From: Nebojsa Miljanovic <neb@...atel-lucent.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: "Kittlitz, Edward (Ned)" <nkittlitz@...atel-lucent.com>,
"Sweeney, Andrew (Andrew)" <asweeney@...atel-lucent.com>,
"Polhemus, William (Bart)" <bpolhemus@...atel-lucent.com>
Subject: SO_REUSEADDR not allowing server and client to use same port
Hello all,
I have seen similar complaints about this issue before in the list archive, but
I have not seen any resolution. So, I am posting the question again in hope of
getting some replies.
Currently, Linux does not allow reuse of same local port for both TCP server and
TCP client. I understand that there may be a need to prevent two servers from
binding to the same local port, but having 1 server and 1 outgoing client use it
should be allowed. Other Unix like operating systems do allow it. Further more,
Linux SCTP socket API allows for this to happen. And, I can't imagine why this
restriction would exists for TCP and not for SCTP.
This issue is caused by tcp_v4_get_port() function (same check is in IPV6
version of this function). It does does not allow for "tb->fastreuse" bit to be
set when passed socket is in listening state. Suggested code change below would
allow for port reuse by a single listening socket and multiple client sockets.
[neb@...sta ipv4]$ cvs diff -u20 -p -w -b tcp_ipv4.c
Index: tcp_ipv4.c
===================================================================
RCS file:
/cvs/cvsroot/Repository/TelicaRoot/components/mvlinux/cge/devkit/lsp/7xx/linux/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
diff -u -2 -0 -p -w -b -r1.1.1.2 tcp_ipv4.c
--- tcp_ipv4.c 27 Apr 2007 12:34:39 -0000 1.1.1.2
+++ tcp_ipv4.c 28 Feb 2008 18:10:16 -0000
@@ -258,46 +258,54 @@ static int tcp_v4_get_port(struct sock *
tb = NULL;
goto tb_not_found;
tb_found:
if (!hlist_empty(&tb->owners)) {
if (sk->sk_reuse > 1)
goto success;
if (tb->fastreuse > 0 &&
sk->sk_reuse && sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN) {
goto success;
} else {
ret = 1;
if (tcp_bind_conflict(sk, tb))
goto fail_unlock;
}
}
tb_not_found:
ret = 1;
if (!tb && (tb = tcp_bucket_create(head, snum)) == NULL)
goto fail_unlock;
if (hlist_empty(&tb->owners)) {
+#if 1 /* Do not check for TCP_LISTEN state */
+ if (sk->sk_reuse)
+#else
if (sk->sk_reuse && sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
+#endif
tb->fastreuse = 1;
else
tb->fastreuse = 0;
} else if (tb->fastreuse &&
+#if 1 /* Do not check for TCP_LISTEN state */
+ (!sk->sk_reuse))
+#else
(!sk->sk_reuse || sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN))
+#endif
tb->fastreuse = 0;
success:
if (!tcp_sk(sk)->bind_hash)
tcp_bind_hash(sk, tb, snum);
BUG_TRAP(tcp_sk(sk)->bind_hash == tb);
ret = 0;
fail_unlock:
spin_unlock(&head->lock);
fail:
local_bh_enable();
return ret;
}
Thanks,
Neb Miljanovic
Alcatel-Lucent
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists