netdev - Re: [Bug 10071] kernel hang in inet_init (PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:58:23 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	Yannick Dirou <yannick.dirou@...tic.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 10071] kernel hang in inet_init (PREEMPT_RCU problem)

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:34:57PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:53:03PM -0800, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10071
> ...
> > ------- Comment #17 from yannick.dirou@...tic.com  2008-02-28 12:53 -------
> > bingo with classic rcu
> 
> Congratulations Yannick!
> 
> So, it seems mainly RCU vs. timer(?) problem. I send CC of this message
> to RCU author, linux-kernel and netdev lists.

Interesting!  Any chance of a pointer to the original messages?
A quick Google search and a look at LKML showed me nothing.  :-/

						Thanx, Paul

> I'm not sure how much time you could/will to offer for this debugging.
> Anyway, if it's possible I think it would be interesting to check with
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU = y again, but CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU = n ("Processor
> type and features --> Support for suspend on SMP and ...") in the
> meantime.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Jarek P.
> 
> 
> > [    0.770854] NET: Registered protocol family 2
> > [    0.770868] 4294668327 net/ipv4/af_inet.c 1387
> > [    0.770884] 4294668327 net/ipv4/af_inet.c 1390
> > [    0.770888] 4294668327 net/ipv4/af_inet.c 1393
> > [    0.770891] 4294668327 net/ipv4/af_inet.c 1402
> > [    0.770893] 4294668327 net/ipv4/af_inet.c 1407
> > [    0.773078] 0 4294668328l
> > [    0.774036] 0 4294668329l
> > [    0.775037] 0 4294668330l
> > [    0.775040] 4294668330 net/ipv4/af_inet.c 1419
> > [    0.775077] 4294668330 net/ipv4/af_inet.c 1426
> > [    0.775077] 4294668330 net/ipv4/route.c 2998
> > [    0.775077] 4294668330 net/ipv4/route.c 3009
> > [    0.775077] 4294668330 net/ipv4/route.c 3016
> > [    0.775077] IP route cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072
> > bytes)
> > [    0.775077] 4294668330 net/ipv4/route.c 3027
> > [    0.775492] TCP established hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576
> > bytes)
> > [    0.776318] TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 9, 2359296 bytes)
> > [    0.785670] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 131072 bind 65536)
> > [    0.785715] TCP reno registered
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> > ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
> > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html