[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803031603100.28251@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:08:19 +0200 (EET)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>
cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removing unneeded statement from tcp_ipv4.c
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> Avoid setting tstamp_ok because this is done two lines later anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index 00156bf..a28c4c2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -1302,15 +1302,14 @@ int tcp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
> }
>
> - if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp && !tmp_opt.rcv_tsval) {
> + if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp && !tmp_opt.rcv_tsval)
> /* Some OSes (unknown ones, but I see them on web server, which
> * contains information interesting only for windows'
> * users) do not send their stamp in SYN. It is easy case.
> * We simply do not advertise TS support.
> */
> tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
> - tmp_opt.tstamp_ok = 0;
> - }
> +
Please move the comment before the if (), only then can you remove those
braces safely (without affecting readability, etc.).
> tmp_opt.tstamp_ok = tmp_opt.saw_tstamp;
>
> tcp_openreq_init(req, &tmp_opt, skb);
--
i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists