[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:09:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 3/3] use SLAB_ALIGN_SMP
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> At least historically SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN has been just a hint,
> although slab tries very hard to satisfy it (see the comments in
> mm/slab.c). Why do we need stronger guarantees than that, btw?
Its a hint. Alignment is specified as a parameter to kmem_cache_create not
as a flag. Maybe we could remove SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN because it is causing
so much confusion?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists