[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:01:18 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
CC: Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
Subject: Re: network namespace ipv6 perfs
Rick Jones wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some performance tests was made by Benjamin to watch out the impact of
>> the network namespace. The good news is there is no impact when used
>> with or without namespaces. That has been checked using a real network
>> device inside a network namespace.
>
> The *_RR tests seem to show a drop in througput and corresponding
> increases in service demand - could that be because things like TSO et
> al cannot mask much of anything in the way of a path-length increase?
Hmm. In fact Benjamin took the 2.6.23.16 kernel where there were no
network namespace code at all. So these differences between 2.6.23.16
and 2.6.25-rc1 does not show a performance degradation especially
related to the network namespaces. The important point is the 2.6.25-rc1
without ipv6 netns and 2.6.25-rc1 with ipv6 netns code applied, I mean
the second and the third line and we can point that the ipv6 netns code
does not degrade performances for either throughput and service demand.
> From the annotations, I'm ass-u-me-ing that NS was only used on the
> netperf side and not both netperf and netserver side?
right :)
> happy benchmarking,
Thanks Rick.
-- Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists